A23 Leads the Charge Against India’s Online Real Money Gambling Ban

Lucas Dunn
By: Lucas Dunn
Aug 28, 2025
World
Litigation Label

Photo by The Blue Diamond Gallery, CC BY-SA 3.0

Key Takeaways

  • A23 argues the ban unfairly targets skill-based games
  • The petition was presented to the Karnataka High Court
  • The Indian Ministry of IT has yet to comment

India’s $2.1 billion online gaming industry, once backed by global investors, now faces an existential crisis under the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gambling Act 2025. A23, an operator of skill-based games like rummy and poker, is the first to contest the law’s constitutionality before the Karnataka High Court.

The operator’s parent company, Head Digital Works, filed the petition on August 28, asserting the legislation “criminalizes the legitimate business of playing online games of skill.” It predicts mass closure across the sector and condemns the ban as a “product of state paternalism”.

Revenue Collapse

India’s gaming giants face operational paralysis as the newly enacted ban triggers shutdowns of money-based platforms. Dream11, a fantasy sports titan, reported a 95% revenue loss overnight, leading to its pullout as India’s national cricket team’s lead sponsor. Others, including MPL, WinZO, and PokerBaazi, have similarly suspended cash operations; however, none have joined A23’s legal challenge.

The law, ratified by President Murmu on August 25 after parliamentary approval, exempts video games, e-sports, and subscription-based social games but prohibits all monetary stakes on all other online games. While A23’s parent company seeks the court’s intervention to protect its 70-million-user platform, industry leaders like MPL are adapting to ad-supported free models. The Indian Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has yet to comment on the litigation.

Investor Confidence Rattled

The real money gaming ban could lead to a $5.4 billion growth reversal, as projected in the India Gaming Report 2025. The industry has attracted $3 billion in foreign investment since 2020 from companies such as Tiger Global and Peak XV Partners. It now grapples with uncertainty as its valuation has plummeted from $3.7 billion to near zero for cash-based platforms.

Supporters of the ban defend it as critical consumer protection against predatory practices, while critics warn of the collateral damage that comes with a blanket ban. Grant Thornton Bharat’s Ananay Jain framed the policy as a “double-edged sword” that will bring regulatory clarity but “risks stifling innovation and burdening startups.”

More Appeals to Government

Leading gaming bodies, including E-Gaming Federation (EGF) and All India Gaming Federation (AIGF), have collectively urged Home Minister Amit Shah to reconsider the ban, highlighting the sector’s high valuation and annual revenues. The authorities argue that the prohibition risks mass job losses, reduced tax revenue, and hindered tech innovation.

Lucas Michael Dunn is a prolific iGaming content writer with 8+ years of experience dissecting it all, from game and casino reviews to industry news, blogs, and guides. A psychology graduate and painter that transitioned into the iGaming world, his articles depend on proven data and tested insights to educate readers on the best gambling approaches. Beyond iGaming content craftsmanship, Lucas is an avid advocate for responsible play, focusing on empowering players to strike a balance between thrill and informed choices.