Pennsylvania Regulator Asks Congress to Act Against Prediction Markets

Michael Savio
By: Michael Savio
Oct 11, 2025
Sports Betting
Photo by NPS photo, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Photo by NPS photo, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Key Takeaways

  • The PGCB asked state representatives to take action against prediction markets
  • States do not have the authority to regulate or tax sports prediction markets
  • Several states and tribal gaming groups have filed lawsuits against operators

The fight against sports prediction markets continues to ramp up, with Pennsylvania launching the latest attack.

The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board has sent a letter to Pennsylvania’s congressional representatives this week. The regulator asked them to take action to prevent the uncontrolled spread of sports prediction markets, echoing requests from many other states. The letter insists that these markets are a dangerous form of unregulated sports betting that hurts both bettors and the states themselves.

The regulator is requesting that control over the new industry be handed to the states, allowing each to make its own decision.

Letter Echoes Bi-Partisan Argument

While a letter to Congress isn’t as drastic a tactic as other states have adopted, it echoes the same message.

A bipartisan group of states has begun to argue that sports prediction markets violate their gambling laws. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission currently has sole authority to regulate the industry, thanks to a loophole that qualifies the markets as a form of trading. This has allowed operators to launch in all 50 states, including those where sports betting remains illegal.

States have called for regulatory power to enforce their own laws, similar to sports betting. That would also require operators to pay state taxes, which they are currently exempt from. With sportsbooks expected to lose revenue to the rival industry, many states fear a massive hit to their tax revenue.

Several States Warn Sportsbooks Over Industry

As of today, Arizona, Ohio, Michigan, and Pennsylvania have all warned sportsbooks against offering prediction markets. They sent out letters to inform operators that their state sports betting licenses could be revoked if they offer sports prediction markets anywhere in the US. While none of those states have enforced those warnings yet, sportsbooks like FanDuel and Underdog may need to decide between the two industries.

The prediction market industry has been loud about its accusations against regulators in these states. They claim they are being unfairly targeted for offering a better product to residents and reject the claim that the controversial markets qualify as sports betting.

Letters May Not Be Enough

While the majority of states have clearly taken their stance against sports prediction markets, it hasn’t been enough to lead to any action. That’s primarily due to the White House’s connection to the industry, with Donald Trump Jr. accepting advisory roles for operators. Given the Republican Party’s refusal to go against the President’s wishes, it seems unlikely Congress will act.

That means states will need to seek relief from the US court system. Several regulators have already filed lawsuits over the industry. They have been joined by a few tribal gaming groups, setting up legal battles that will play out across the US over the next year.

Michael is a writer from Denver who covers the sports betting industry for Casino.com. He has been covering the industry for over four years, focusing on providing accurate and easy-to-understand information for readers. When he’s not covering the industry, he’s betting on sports or exploring everything that Colorado has to offer.