American Bettors Deserve Clarity on Sports Prediction Markets

Michael Savio
By: Michael Savio
Oct 10, 2025
Sports Betting
Photo by Negative Space, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Photo by Negative Space, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Key Takeaways

  • Kalshi is now offering parlay options for customers
  • The nominee to lead to CFTC was been dropped from consideration
  • Only two of the five CFTC commissioner seats are currently filled

Kalshi has seen massive volume during the NFL season, but questions remain about the industry it has been fighting to protect.

There is a seemingly endless amount of lawsuits involving sports prediction markets being reviewed, but no significant rulings have been issued. That has left American bettors uncertain about the industry’s future, though it hasn’t prevented them from using the controversial markets.

With the football betting season well underway and the NHL and NBA seasons starting, it is time for the US legal system and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to provide some clarity.

Rules Around Markets Remain Unclear

The biggest questions around sports prediction markets center on the rules operators are required to follow. Since event contracts are not considered to be a form of sports betting, platforms don’t need to follow the strict rules and regulations that the gambling industry is subject to.

This key distinction raises many questions, especially around fair play laws. Those require sportsbooks to provide bettors with a fair chance to win their wagers, but prediction markets are exempt. 

Operators originally focused on straight bets, with the price (or odds) being set by market demand. However, parlays need odds to be set, which would require a partnership with an bookmaker. Kalshi recently launched this feature without an announcement, or information on how odds were being set.

How Will the CFTC Manage the Industry?

As of now, the CFTC has sole regulatory authority over the prediction market industry, including for sports. However, states are pushing hard to move that authority to their own regulators, who also covers sports betting.

One of the most significant concerns is the CFTC’s ability to regulate an industry growing at the speed of light. The department has suffered cuts to its staff, and has not added any to account for sports prediction markets. That will make it harder to monitor and catch problems, potentially putting customers in danger.

One reason for the CFTC remaining mostly silent on the industry is their lack of leadership. Only two of the five commissioner positions are currently filled, and the White Houses’s nominee to take over has been dropped. Until those spots are filled, we may not get much clrity from the federal regulator.

What About Problem Gambling?

Those lobbying on behalf of sports prediciton markets are arguing that state governments should not be allowed to tamper with the industry. They claim that Americans have the right to spend their hard-earned money how they see fit, and shouldn’t be limited by state lawmakers.

While that argument has been effective, it has also raised alarms over problem gambling. The “hands off” approach to the industry suggests that it may not include problem gambling protocols. This could lead to a horrific spike in gambling addiction, as well as the crimes that oftern come with it. 

Michael is a writer from Denver who covers the sports betting industry for Casino.com. He has been covering the industry for over four years, focusing on providing accurate and easy-to-understand information for readers. When he’s not covering the industry, he’s betting on sports or exploring everything that Colorado has to offer.