Court Rejects Request to Move Baltimore Sportsbook Lawsuit

Michael Savio
By: Michael Savio
Sports Betting
Photo by Tim Evanson, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Photo by Tim Evanson, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Key Takeaways

  • Baltimore will need to pursue its sports betting lawsuit in state courts
  • The city alleges FanDuel and DraftKings are violating its new laws around ads
  • A Massachusetts court delivered a similar ruling in a lawsuit against Kalshi

FanDuel and DraftKings picked up a big win in the Old Line State this week.

A Maryland District Court ruled against the city of Baltimore's request to transfer its lawsuit against the operators to a higher court. The ruling stated that the judge did not believe the request merited the move and that a federal court was not needed to resolve the legal battle.

The denial means the case will now head back to Baltimore City Circuit Court.

Lawsuit Accuses Operators of Deceptive Ads

The lawsuit was filed by the city of Baltimore in April, alleging that the industry leaders violated its advertising rules. They accuse FanDuel and DraftKings of using misleading promotions and aggressive VIP marketing to lure people into losing more money. This practice is devastating to populations vulnerable to problem gambling, leading to the lawsuit.

Baltimore updated its advertising laws in 2023 to better protect its residents. However, those laws do not apply to the rest of the state. That led the operator to argue that the case doesn’t warrant a move to federal court.

Judge Rules State Courts Must Decide

One of the key reasons for the court’s rejection of the request was the state’s role in sports betting. 

Maryland created its own rules and regulations around legal sports betting, which are also enforced. The Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency (MLGCA) has sole authority to regulate the market and to assess fines for rule violations.

The district court believed that moving the case to federal court would violate the state’s right to control its own market. Therefore, the state court must decide the case.

Similar Ruling Delivered in Massachusetts

The court’s decision follows closely another issued by a court in Massachusetts.

The State Attorney General had pushed to have a lawsuit against Kalshi moved to federal court. Unlike sports betting, prediction market operators like Kalshi are regulated by the CFTC. She argued this meant the lawsuit should be moved to federal court, but a judge disagreed.

In the ruling, the Massachusetts court refused to transfer the case, finding it should be resolved at the state level. While Kalshi is regulated at a federal level, the judge said that doesn’t matter, since the lawsuit alleges a violation of the state’s betting laws.

Michael is a writer from Denver who covers the sports betting industry for Casino.com. He has been covering the industry for over four years, focusing on providing accurate and easy-to-understand information for readers. When he’s not covering the industry, he’s betting on sports or exploring everything that Colorado has to offer.