Ohio Senator Introduces Online Casino Bill, Has Large Support

Grant Mitchell
By: Grant Mitchell
05/15/2025
Industry

Photo by GetArchive, CC0 1.0

Key Takeaways

  • The bill would incentivize local casinos to handle their own online operations
  • The tax rate could be as high as 40 percent, the highest in the country
  • Crucial state figures also want to legalize online casinos

The Ohio legislature is taking another crack at legalizing online casinos.

Sen. Nathan Manning (R-North Ridgeville) earlier this week presented Senate Bill 197, which would legalize online casinos, slot machines, table games, and poker, along with parimutuel betting and an iLottery.

The bill would also allow the state’s four retail casinos and seven video lottery racinos to apply for one iGaming license each.

Details of the bill

The bill has already undergone its first reading in the Senate Select Committee on Gaming.

Manning’s plan would tax online casino platforms 36 percent of their gaming revenue. Licenses would cost $50 million and grant eligibility for five years or until the license was pulled. Renewal fees would cost $5 million after the initial five-year period.

License holders who used a third-party iGaming platform would pay twice as much for licenses, meaning $100 million upfront and $10 million every renewal, and would be taxed 40 percent of their revenue. That was designed to keep business inside the state.

The 40 percent would be the largest tax penalty in the country among states with legal online casino markets, even ahead of Pennsylvania’s 36 percent.

99 percent of tax revenue generated through the online casinos would be given to the Ohio General Fund, which covers basic government programs such as Medicaid and education. The remaining one percent would be used to restock the Problem Gambling Fund.

Only seven states currently offer legal online casino markets, giving Ohio the chance to capitalize on a largely untapped market. 

The tides are turning

The bill does not deal exclusively with online casinos. For example, it calls for a 50 percent reduction on the current sports betting tax rate, which it would change to 10 percent. It would also ban the use of the word “free” in sports betting advertising (as in “free” bets), ban gambling ads from college campuses, and add mandatory player safety measures.

Manning estimated that creating an online casino marketplace would generate $300 million to $1 billion in annual funding for the state.

“We kind of put this together very quickly, but I will say we’ve been working on this for years,” Manning said during the hearing.

Manning already has several important figures on his side. That includes House Finance Chair Brian Stewart (R-Ashville), who also introduced an online casino bill earlier this month, Senate President Rob McColley (R-Napoleon) and House Speaker Matt Huffman (R-Lima).

“Certainly, other states have shown us that when they take the dollars and they’re distributed to programs that are always underfunded, there’s a helping hand there,” said Minority Leader Nickie Antonio (D-Lakewood). “I think it’s important for us to look at.”

Retail casino operators are split on whether or not they want to expand to the online world. Critics believe the addition would detract from the facilities’ bottom line.

Grant is a former graduate of Virginia Tech, a former NCAA track and field athlete, and an avid sports fan and sports bettor. He aims to provide up-to-the-minute and detailed coverage of headlines in the sports betting industry. Grant joined the professional ranks in 2021 and quickly made a name for himself, working with entities such as Forbes and VSiN and earning a reliable reputation in the industry. When he’s not working, you can find him exercising, walking around the city, or somewhere watching the big game of the day.