DraftKings Agrees to Return $3 Million to Connecticut Bettors

Michael Savio
By: Michael Savio
Responsible Gambling
Photo by jglazer75, CC BY 2.0

Photo by jglazer75, CC BY 2.0

Key Takeaways

  • DraftKings was accused of violating advertising laws in Connecticut
  • The settlement does not require DraftKings to admit liability
  • The operator is facing similar lawsuits in Maryland and Massachusetts

DraftKings is ready to put a legal battle in Connecticut behind them.

The casino and sports betting giant has agreed to refund $3 million to thousands of online casino customers in the state of Connecticut. The move is part of a settlement that DraftKings reached with the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP), which regulates the state’s online casino market. It ends a legal battle between the two sides over alleged violations of Connecticut’s advertising laws.

While DraftKings has agreed to the refund, they continue to deny any wrongdoing.

Ad Language Led to Investigation

According to the DCP, the alleged violation occurred during ads run between 2021 and 2023, which promoted deposit bonuses. The regulator said that the ads in question did not include key terms and conditions, including wagering requirements. 

The missing language from the ads led many bettors to claim them without fully understanding the terms and conditions. They assumed that the deposit bonus was being paid out in real money, unaware that it would instead be a credit that had to be wagered before it could be withdrawn.

Additional Penalties Focus on Responsible Gaming

The $3 million refund is an eye-catching penalty from the DCP, but it wasn’t the only fine the company will pay. DraftKings will also be required to pay $50,000 to support various DCP programs.

In addition to the monetary penalties, the operator will host and finance an annual training seminar on Connecticut’s advertising laws for all marketing personnel working in the state. This will help train their employees to ensure they know the language that each advertisement must include.

Lastly, the settlement requires the online casino to further promote its Casino Education Hub, a responsible gaming resource that educates bettors on various topics, including understanding casino promotions.

DraftKings Refuses Liability

While the gambling giant agreed to refund the affected customers, the settlement does not require any admission of guilt. DraftKings continues to insist that it did not violate the laws in question, and for good reason. 

The company is currently facing similar accusations in Massachusetts and Maryland. An admission of guilt in the settlement with the DCP would have doomed the operator’s defense in the other two Northeastern markets. While the large penalty is a setback, the ability to avoid admitting liability represents a significant and potentially money-saving advantage.

Michael is an avid sports fan and a veteran bettor from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He learned the trade from his grandfather in Las Vegas as a kid. As an adult, Michael started picking games for a small sports betting site and has built it into a career. His experience allows him to provide tips and information to help other bettors improve their game. Michael cheers for all Wisconsin pro teams, the Arizona State Sun Devils (his alma mater), and the Ottawa Senators. He specializes in baseball betting but has extensive experience in football, basketball, and hockey. When he isn’t pouring over stats, he’s spending time with his two young children or hiking and enjoying the outdoors.