Judge Awards $112K Online Casino Jackpot to Account Holder

Richard Janvrin
By: Richard Janvrin
Legal
Judge Awards $112K Online Casino Jackpot to Account Holder

Photo by Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Key Takeaways

  • A judge ruled an online casino jackpot belongs to the account holder
  • The plaintiff claimed he funded the account and hit the winning spin
  • The court found he was using the account without permission

Following a dispute between former partners in Canada over a six-figure win at an online casino, a Canadian judge has made a ruling. 

The ruling: the money belonged to the woman whose account was used, despite the ex-boyfriend claiming to be the one who hit it, according to CTV News

The jackpot was for more than $112,000, and it came in April 2022. The ex-boyfriend, Timothy Jones, a 51-year-old fisherman, said the money should be his because he was playing at the time and had put money into the account before winning. 

However, it instead went to Cheryl Johnson, a 50-year-old social worker.

“This is not a case where the casino winnings were paid by mistake to the defendant,” reads Tindale’s decision from last week. “It was the defendant’s casino account and it was the defendant’s money which was used to play the winning game.”

This decision came right around the time Alberta opened its virtual doors for online sports betting and casino play. 

Court Finds Account Holder Owned the Winnings

Additionally, the judge found that Jones was playing without permission, as Johnson asked him to stop playing using said account in December 2021. CTV News said he didn't dispute that. 

Johnson did send him payments totaling $5,200, but said she did that to “get him out of her life."

At the time, Jones wasn't working as his job is seasonal, so he was depending on employment insurance. He received a payment on April 13, deposited $190 into the account, and later won the money. 

“The plaintiff says that because he provided the funds for the casino winnings, he is beneficially entitled to the winnings and the defendant received those funds as a constructive trustee,” reads Tindale’s judgment.

Judge Rejects Ex-Boyfriend's Arguments

Also, while playing, Jones allowed Johnson's teenage son, who wasn't legally old enough to gamble, to "make a few spins." 

Jones later took to Facebook to announce he won, but said he wasn't referring to the son. 

“In my view, on a game of chance there can be no strategy which the plaintiff employed that resulted in the casino winnings beyond the fact that the plaintiff played the game,” Tindale’s decision said.

Richard Janvrin is a graduate of the University of New Hampshire. He started writing as a teenager before breaking into sports coverage professionally in 2015. From there, he entered the iGaming space in 2018 and has covered numerous aspects, including news, reviews, bonuses/promotions, sweepstakes casinos, legal, and more.

Add as preferred source Casino.com on Google Your #1 casino news source

Stay updated with the latest in Casinos, Gambling & Gaming

Follow Casino.com for breaking news, features, expert guides, responsible gambling advice, legal updates & financial insights.