Why Gambling Tax Reform Is Back on the Agenda
The current tax framework was designed around a gambling landscape that looks very different from the digital-first market that now exists. Policymakers argue that online gambling growth, combined with shifting player behaviour, has exposed weaknesses in how different products are taxed. From a Treasury perspective, reform is often framed as a way to simplify the system and ensure fairness across verticals.
However, the timing is sensitive. Operators are already adapting to tighter affordability checks and compliance costs. Adding tax uncertainty into the mix risks compounding existing pressures.
Industry Concerns Over Competitiveness and Channelisation
Across the sector, there is clear anxiety about how tax changes could affect competitiveness. Operators warn that higher or restructured taxes may push costs onto players, potentially driving some customers toward unregulated alternatives. Channelisation remains a core concern, particularly in a market that prides itself on strong consumer protections.
We’ve also seen warnings that uneven tax treatment between products could distort innovation, favouring some verticals while discouraging investment in others. For many, stability is just as important as the headline tax rate.
"The government will not proceed with introducing a single tax on remote betting and gaming. Instead, to raise revenue and better reflect the modern nature and impacts of gambling, the following changes will be introduced: The rate of Remote Gaming Duty will be increased from 21% to 40% from 1 April 2026. A new remote betting rate of 25% will be introduced within General Betting Duty from 1 April 2027, remote bets on UK horse-racing will be excluded from these changes and remain subject to a rate of 15% — the new rate does not include bets placed via self-service betting terminals, Pool Betting and Spread Betting. Bingo Duty will be abolished from 1 April 2026." - Policy paper, UK government.
A balancing act for policymakers and regulators
For policymakers, the challenge lies in striking the right balance. There is political pressure to ensure gambling delivers an appropriate return to the public purse. Especially amid wider fiscal constraints. At the same time, regulators and industry voices continue to stress that overreach can undermine long-term objectives.
The current mood is one of caution rather than outright opposition. Most stakeholders accept that reform is possible. Even necessary. What remains contested is how far changes should go and how quickly they should be introduced.
