Foxborough Questions Security Funding Ahead of World Cup

Michael Savio
By: Michael Savio
World Cup 2026
Photo by Bernard Gagnon, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Photo by Bernard Gagnon, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Key Takeaways

  • The town needs $8 million to meet FIFA security requirements
  • Foxborough is unwilling to front taxpayer money for the costs
  • Matches could be relocated if answers are provided by mid-March

Officials from Foxborough, Massachusetts, aren’t ready to trust FIFA at its word. 

Town Manager Paige Duncan told ESPN that she is demanding answers from FIFA over the $8 million security budget required for World Cup matches held at Gillette Stadium. While the global league has told town officials the money would come, no clear plan on where it could come from has been shared. 

If that money can’t be established by mid-March, Foxborough won’t host any matches.

FIFA confirmed it is in talks with town officials and is not concerned about relocating the matches.

Big Promises, Few Answers

Unlike many other host cities, Foxborough is a small town with a population of just over 18,000. While it's home to an NFL franchise, many fans travel in from neighboring Boston. 

With the town lacking the resources of a big city, it can’t take a “trust the process” approach. Spending $8 million in taxpayer funds would require public input, as the public won’t accept the money up front without a clear plan for reimbursement.

Duncan has confirmed that FIFA has discussed several funding options leading up to the tournament. However, the lack of a clear plan with the stadium’s first match just four months away has led officials to set a deadline for answers.

US Federal Funds Could Be Applied

While Duncan and other Foxborough officials are asking FIFA for answers, the US federal government may have the solutions. It has earmarked around $625 million to enhance security at the 2026 World Cup host sites, but no information has been shared on how it will be disbursed.

While Patriots’ owner Bob Kraft owns Gillette Stadium, Foxborough owns the land it sits on. That means the town will be responsible for security and have the final say on hosting matches.

Could Matches be Moved?  

In short, yes.

The US government has already indicated it may move matches from certain cities it deems “too dangerous.” FIFA confirmed it would respect the US’s decision to move matches, opening the door for the possibility.

While Foxborough is speaking of pulling out of hosting duties, delivering on that threat could be difficult. Not only would it cost itself and Boston massive tax dollars, but it would likely put them at odds with Kraft. The famed NFL owner is an ally of President Trump, and could help force town officials to front the money, or find another compromise. Otherwise, they could face losing the historic franchise to another Boston-area town. 

Michael is a writer from Denver who covers the sports betting industry for Casino.com. He has been covering the industry for over four years, focusing on providing accurate and easy-to-understand information for readers. When he’s not covering the industry, he’s betting on sports or exploring everything that Colorado has to offer.