SBA Drops Lawsuit Against Chicago, But Will Continue Fight

Michael Savio
By: Michael Savio
Sports Betting
PA Uploader, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

PA Uploader, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Key Takeaways

  • The SBA is dropping a request for a restraining order against Chicago
  • Chicago issued licenses to all online operators on January 1
  • The SBA and state lawmakers are both fighting Chicago’s new rules

Chicago picked up a big win in its battle over sports betting, though it may be temporary.

The Sports Betting Alliance (SBA) has announced it is dropping a motion for a restraining order in a Cook County court. The lobby group had requested that a court delay the new tax and licensing requirements approved by the city, warning that operators could go offline if they went into effect. However, an expedited licensing process in Chicago made the delay unnecessary, leading to the lawsuit being dropped. 

While the SBA is abandoning this battle, the group promised it isn’t done fighting against the changes.

SBA Feared Delayed Licenses 

The SBA, whose members include bet365, BetMGM, DraftKings, Fanatics, and FanDuel, has plenty of issues with Chicago’s new rules, but concerns over delayed licenses ranked among the top.

The lobby group’s request for a restraining order came quickly, as the new rules went into effect on January 1. Since licenses didn’t exist before then, the group worried sportsbooks would be considered to be operating illegally in the city. That could not only lead to fines from the city but also affect the status of their licenses in other states.

The SBA thanked Chicago for handling the issue quickly, negating the need for a restraining order.

Chicago’s Win is Temporary

The restraining order threat may be over, but the SBA will continue to fight Chicago’s new sports betting rules in court. 

The group has described Chicago’s changes as illegal, a view that state lawmakers also agree with. A pair of state lawmakers has already begun to lead efforts to force Chicago to reconsider its changes. 

One is pushing to update the state’s gambling laws to make it clear that cities have no right to regulate state markets. This would make Chicago’s changes illegal and end the need for operators to follow them.

The other is looking to redistribute the tax revenue Chicago already received from the state’s sports betting market. Those funds were set aside to allow the city a cut of the thriving industry. With Chicago adding its own tax and licensing fees, those funds are no longer needed or deserved.

The Parent Trap Effect

If you aren’t familiar, The Parent Trap is a film that tells a story of kids getting their divorced parents to fall back into love.

While it isn’t their intention, Chicago is setting up a similar situation in Illinois. The state and the industry have been at war over tax hikes, which have led to new fees and higher minimums being issued by sportsbooks. The two sides have been clashing in public and the courtroom, decimating the relationship they once had.

Now, both sides have focused their anger on Chicago. While it won’t magically cure the damage done, the new fight will bring the sides together for a common cause. That dialogue could ease tensions and bring the country’s second-largest sports betting market back from the brink of disaster. 

Michael is a writer from Denver who covers the sports betting industry for Casino.com. He has been covering the industry for over four years, focusing on providing accurate and easy-to-understand information for readers. When he’s not covering the industry, he’s betting on sports or exploring everything that Colorado has to offer.