German court seeks clarity from EU judges
Germany’s Federal Court of Justice referred the case after being asked to rule on whether a player could reclaim losses from gambling activity carried out before July 2021.
At the heart of the dispute is whether online gambling contracts should be treated as void if an operator did not hold a German licence at the time. And even where it operated legally under another EU jurisdiction. Tipico has argued that applying German restrictions retrospectively would conflict with EU principles on the freedom to provide services.
Pre-2021 licensing gap under scrutiny
Before Germany brought out its legislation, online casino and betting licences were few and far between. They were also slow to issue. Many operators licensed by other regulators, like the Malta Gaming Authority, were accepting German customers.
Plaintiffs in loss recovery cases are making claims. They say that this regulatory gap renders historic gambling contracts invalid. Operators are countering this by saying that the absence of a workable German licensing system should not expose them to civil liability years later.
Industry impact and litigation risk
The outcome of the Tipico case could influence thousands of similar claims currently progressing through German courts. Legal observers have warned that an adverse ruling for operators could open the door to significant financial exposure across the sector.
The case is being closely watched by regulators and operators in other EU markets. It’s of particular interest to those with restrictive or transitional licensing frameworks. A ruling from the EU court is expected to provide long-awaited clarity on how national gambling laws interact with EU legal principles.