House Bets Led to Crackdown
While legal sports betting has changed the way we view gambling in this country, DFS operators can only blame themselves for their current predicament.
Over the last few years, operators began to offer thinly veiled sports betting in the form of new DFS games. Customers would compete against the house while betting on player stats, similar to pro betting at a sportsbook. While these games are incredibly popular, they have also drawn a lot of negative attention.
State lawmakers and regulators have begun to call these games an unregulated form of gambling. They believe the industry is feeding the growth of the problem of gambling in the US while not paying taxes to the states in which they operate. That has led to fines, lawsuits, and now state bans.
DFS Operators Face Uncertain Future
Over a decade after DraftKings and FanDuel brought DFS into the mainstream in the US, it seems the industry could be entering its final stretch.
While operators like PrizePicks have been attempting to update their platforms to comply with regulations, a growing group of opponents believes there is no longer a place for DFS in the US. Those include tribal gaming groups, who believe these platforms are taking business away from their own industry.
While California is the first state to decide to ban the platforms, it may not be the last.
No More State-Specific Changes
PrizePicks originally planned to update its California platform to avoid the ban. However, the operators ultimately decided to make the change on a national level. That means no US bettors have access to PrizePicks’ against-the-house games.
The reason for this decision is the current climate around the DFS industry. Other states are considering enacting similar bans or crackdowns, which could mean operators like PrizePicks face different regulations depending on the markets they are in. By implementing a national change, the DFS giant aims to secure its future across the US.